REVIEW: Van Halen – 3 (1998 collector’s tin)

Welcome back to the second installment of our Van Halen two-parter review.  Last time we talked about the Can’t Stop Loving You singles.  Today, we’ll be discussing the controversial Van Halen 3, with a special emphasis on this neat but overpriced collector’s tin.

Van Halen – 3 (collectors’ tin 1998)

In this day and age, bands always release different editions of albums, to jack up the price and hopefully also sell multiple versions to the same buyer.  Today we get bonus tracks, entire bonus CDs, or a DVD to get us to pay a higher price.  In 1998, at least with this Van Halen album, we got nothing of the sort.  We got paper, plastic, and tin, but no extra content.  It is bonus content that gets me to pay the higher price, normally.  Throw on exclusive music and the collector in me salivates.

Before we get into all that, let’s talk about Van Halen 3, the album.

Fact: Van Halen shot themselves in the foot when they went through the whole Sammy-quit-now-Dave-is-back-no-he-isn’t thing. I remember watching the MTV Awards in 1996, and thinking that Dave being back in Van Halen was about the best thing that had ever happened.   And then when I found out that Gary Cherone was lead singer?  Hoping for the best, fearing for the worst.

I’d been following Cherone for years, and his touch on Extreme’s III Sides To Every Story was absolutely sublime.  But even though both Extreme and Van Halen had a penchant for flashy solos and the odd ballad, it just didn’t seem like the right match.  Cherone was a spiritual and political lyricist, nothing like the party animal of Hagar nor the ringmaster of Roth.

Van Halen 3 was as complex and mature as you could have hoped, which is fine, but it also sounds decidingly unlike the band Van Halen. And vocally, something is wrong. Listening to this album, Cherone is not singing in his old style. He’s shrieking, pushing his voice to the breaking point, and sounding unfortunately a lot like Sammy Hagar, confusing the fans even more. On top of that, when I played the album I noticed right away that something didn’t sound right with the band itself. Turns out, I was right — Michael Anthony only played on three tracks. The rest was all Eddie on bass and backing vocals.

Van Halen 3 (still don’t really get the name) is a semi-triumph for the band, in certain senses. It is long, mature, diverse, progressive, and paradoxically it is also similar to 1984, soundwise. It has a similar coldness…like a chill was in the room where you can hear Eddie’s amp humming away. “From Afar” is so spare and epic, one can only wonder what would have happened if it was on 1984.  Elsewhere, Eddie’s warm synth has returned on tracks such as “Once”.  The guitars have that warm-amp fuzz to them that you just can’t fake with pro-tools.

Yet it is only a semi-triumph. As much as I want to like this album, I have to admit, these don’t sound like finished songs. Aside from my “highlight” songs (below) a lot of the tunes sound like they’re only half finished. As if Van Halen were songwriting amatures, and this is an overindulgent and underplanned demo tape. Eddie’s guitarwork is great, as always, but much of the time it sounds like he’s just jamming with himself. While this is fantastic to listen to from a technique point of view, you’re not humming the riffs an hour later, like you can every time you listen to Fair Warning or even Unlawful.

My highlights (not including instrumentals):
“Without You”
“One I Want”
“From Afar”

Other songs, like “Ballot or the Bullet” just barely hang together.

The album especially stumbles when Eddie takes his first lead vocal on the smoky barroom ballad “How Many Say I”. The song is no good and Eddie can’t sing lead.

The best song, and the most Van Halen-like, wasn’t even on the album. “That’s Why I Love You” appeared on early promos, and should have been the single, but was dropped by Warners in a monumental error of judgement. If it had appeared, and if it was the first single, the fate of this album would definitely have been different. Track it down. You’ll see what I mean.

The tin itself is nice.  It has the Van Halen 3 cannonball guy printed on it, the VH “globe” logo printed on the back.   Incidentally, the CD inside is unique.  The regular retail edition did not have the checker pattern or the “circus” Van Halen logo.  If you’re buying one of these used make sure you’re getting the correct CD with your tin.  Also make sure it’s not scratched.  It is stored in a paper sleeve prone to this.


Inside are a pick (a pink one?) with VH logo, a 3 sticker, and numerous pieces of slotted card paper with pictures on them  Some pictures are of the band, and some with just a “3” theme.  The band photos are pretty cool.  It almost looks as if Van Halen were a real band at the time!  Some of these paper cards have lyrics and liner notes too.

The slotted paper cards have instructions that you can assemble them in a number of unique ways.  Never having done this before, I took this review as the opportunity to try it.  Fun??  No, not really.


3/5 stars for the album

2/5 stars for the tin


I thought while we’re at it, let’s also take a look at the “Without You” promo CD single.  It contains a 4:57 edit (album version is 6:28 so a significant edit version).  It is mostly notable for its packaging:  A clear red case, giant puffy 3 sticker stuck to it, and a Van Halen logo sticker in the upper right corner.  The CD is designed to look like a 3″ single.  Definitely worth tracking down for collectors who love unique looking discs.




  1. VH3…the red headed stepchild of the VH catalog. Or is it? Like so many other diehards, I was ELATED when the news broke that Hagar was out and Roth was back in. Quite a letdown when it was made public that Dave was out, and depending on the source may never have truly been back in. Anyway, the prospect of Cherone on vocals made me nervous. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve always loved Extreme, but Gary singing on a VH album? I was skeptical that it would be pleasing to my ears, and unfortunately VH3 seemed to be a dud. It came across to me as more of an EVH solo album than a Van Halen record. There were a few songs I truly did and still do like. WITHOUT YOU, FIRE IN THE HOLE, DIRTY WATER DOG, and to a lesser extent ONE I WANT spanned from great to tolerable. The rest? 100% filler. I will give the band credit for trying to make an album that they could spread their wings and try new types of songs. Hell, I’d listen to this over BALANCE any day. So the album was dead on arrival. The tour, however, was INCREDIBLE. Finally, Roth era songs were played. They played quite a few, actually. Gary was all over the stage and was great interacting with the crowd. I saw this tour at the Fleet Center (formerly the Boston Garden) and had great seats. Since Cherone is a Boston native, he was accepted with open arms by the crowd in attendance. The highlights of the show? Anything that Hagar refused to sing from the Roth era, especially MEAN STREETS. Michael Anthony singing lead on SOMEBODY GET ME A DOCTOR was magic, and Ed’s guitar solo was the best one I’ve ever seen live, and I’ve seen VH live numerous times. I think the highlight of the concert was when Gary joked with the crowd, asking us “So, do you guys like my new backing band?” The crowd, including myself laughed approvingly at his joke. Sub par album at best, phenominal concert. Was VH3 truly a dud? Depends on one’s perspective I guess.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I go back and forth on this album all the time. I wrote this review 5 years ago…if I wrote it in 1998 I would rate it 4.5/5 stars. If I wrote it in 2017…? Who knows. Probably 3.5-4 stars today.


  2. Just listening to this. It’s a weird mix. A bit like those mashup’s. For me Gary is identified with Extreme too much just can’t over this not being Extreme and for it to be Halen there’s Gary’s voice again taking u back to Extreme. It’s like in cooking if one flavour dominates the dish too much.


Rock a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s