REVIEW: Sammy Hagar & the Best of All Worlds Band – The Residency (2025)

SAMMY HAGAR & THE BEST OF ALL WORLDS BAND – The Residency (2025 Big Machine Rock)

Chickenfoot are back!  A rose by any other name, right?  Nothing wrong with it.  Nothing at all.  It would have been nice if there was some kind of official Van Halen tribute show, but since nobody else wanted to do it, it’s up to Sammy.  The songs deserve to be kept alive, both Sammy and Roth eras.  There are only two Roth songs here, but we didn’t expect more.  Recorded in Vegas during April and May 2025, the album was produced by Sammy Hagar, Joe Satriani, and Chris Lord-Alge.

The truth is that when Michael Anthony sings those backing vocals, things just sound a little Van Halen-y.  Joe Satriani is one of the only guys in the world I’d want to hear play Van Halen songs besides Eddie himself.  Sure, Joe doesn’t play the same.  Eddie was freewheeling and improvisational.  Joe is schooled and plays with forethought.  He is more than capable of pulling Eddie’s tricks and trademarks, but tends to stay away from slavish imitation.  He may do a pick scrape exactly where Eddie did it on “Top of the World”, but he doesn’t necessarily play all the hooks and fills exactly as Ed did.  He usually plays them close enough that the solos are true to the original while not being exact copies.  In other places, he goes off into jazzy territory that wouldn’t have been explored before.  That is really the way it should be when it comes to a tribute to the greatest guitar player who ever lived.  He wouldn’t want to hear Joe imitating him, either.

Kenny Aronoff is one of the best drummers suited around, always in demand.  It would have been nice if Jason Bonham was still around, but Kenny might be better suited to the Van Halen material (listen to him on “Summer Nights”).  Adding those necessary backing keyboards (and guitars and vocals) is Rai Thistlethwayte, from Australia’s Thirsty Merc.  Normally he’s a frontman and hitmaker unto himself, but this is a pretty tempting gig to take.

As for Sammy himself, Hagar is one of the most reliable figures in all of hard rock.  Barely aging as the decades pass, and always releasing new music and touring behind it, Sammy Hagar is rock and roll’s unsung stalwart.  He may often say too much, but on stage, he’s still in great shape.  Now, the songs are detuned a little bit to accommodate the aging human voice.  This is unavoidable.

The live album opens with the tribute to Eddie aptly called “Encore, Thank You, Goodnight”.  (The studio version is on a rare 7″ single that is very hard to find.)   Joe Satriani plays several licks that are in homage to Edward the Great.  Simple but poignant lyrics like “Since you’ve been gone, things don’t feel the same.”  It’s a decent enough song, but likely wouldn’t have attracted much attention if not for the words.  Decent song but only notable for its lyrics and intent.  It would not have been a standout on either of the two Chickenfoot albums.

It soon becomes evident that this album is as much a tribute to Sammy as to Eddie.  There are five Sammy solo hits included:  “One Way To Rock” (which admittedly Van Halen played live on the 5150 tour), “Eagles Fly” (unnecessary), “Mas Tequila!” (almost insulting considering that Eddie disapproved of Sammy promoting his tequila while on tour with Van Halen), “Heavy Metal” (which Van Halen never played live) and “I Can’t Drive 55”.  Contrast this with the two David Lee Roth era songs included:  “Panama”, and “Ain’t Talkin’ ‘Bout Love” (which Sammy doesn’t even sing; Rai does!).  Not even “Jump”, which Van Halen released as a live single with Sammy singing.  Throw in Montrose’s “Rock Candy” and it’s clear this isn’t entirely about the mighty Van Halen.

The setlist includes a few delights.  “There’s Only One Way to Rock” gives Joe a chance to really stretch out.  “Humans Being” was neglected by Van Halen, but this band does a great live version of it.  The only shame is that due to the decades past, Sammy doesn’t sing it in that monotone rasp.  Joe though, wow, he really nails the Eddie vibe on the guitar solo!  This version of “Humans Being” really shows why Joe was the right guy for this gig.  Meanwhile, Michael’s bass reminds us of why he was so integral to the band’s sound.  It’s great to hear “5150” (though the title should be in quotes on the back cover).  “Rock Candy” and “Heavy Metal” are awesome, regardless of the shift in focus away from Eddie.  “Love Walks In” is an interesting way to close the album, but it does work.

We always like to complain about setlists for shows like this.  It would probably have been appropriate to drop “Eagles Fly” and “Mas Tequila!” in favour of other songs (definitely not “Little White Lie”).  Anything to represent the Balance album would be welcome.  Sammy even could have included something from I Never Said Goodbye, an album that Eddie played bass on and co-produced.  That said, the album remains a solid listen.

Some diehards (or those who claim to be) won’t give The Residency a chance, but any fan of these musicians will love to hear how they interpret the works of Van Halen.  Pretty satisfying.

4/5 stars

42 comments

  1. I never expected Sammy Hagar to try to capitalize on Charli XCX Brat green with his logo, but here we are. I don’t think he’s gonna woo any of her fans though.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  2. SPAM BELOW

    Continuing our study of the Gemara of Kiddushin. משנה תורה אב משנה, סוגיה ב’ — מניינא דף ג

    Understanding the basics of Oral Torah a fundamentally required absolute. Wrote of rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט compared to rabbi Yishmael’s כלל – פרט, פרט – כלל middot by which both men interpreted through different sh’ittot the kabbalah of פרדס inductive logic reasoning. Clearly neither Boris Badenov, nor his boot licking sidekick Natasha Fatale (Rambam & Yosef Karo) understood the distinctions which separate Torah common law from Roman statute law.

    ולרב הונא דאמר חופה קונה מק”ו. למעוטי מאי? למעוטי חליפין. ס”ד אמינא הואיל וגמר קיחה קיחה משדה עפרון, מה שדה מקניא בחליפין, אף אשה נמי מקניא בחליפין. קמ”ל. This “משל” term “קמ”ל”, what defines its נמשל interpretation? The Gemara asks: למעוטי מאי? Hence, our Gemara contrasts rabbi Yishmael’s midda of ק”ו against rabbi Akiva’s midda of רבוי מיעט. When ever encountering a קמ”ל, this משל teaches the נמשל of either a רבוי מיעט. A fundamental chiddush, how to correctly read the Talmud with an understanding discerning eye – comparable to the tongue of a wine bibber. The Talmud defines understanding as: discernment like from like.

    The פרט of בראשית כד:ב requires research. Let’s open by making a מדרש רבה analysis. Midrash functions as a reference resource for Talmudic study. The flat assimilated Yeshiva education system totally ignores learning Talmud together with Midrash, a clumsy yet cunning schemer basic Snidely Whiplash error. Which utterly backfires in a pathetic shallow addiction to the Rambam error of literal word translation Orthodox Judaism religious stupidity.

    בראשית רבה נט:ח – Midrash Rabbah connects this verse through the midda of גזירה שוה to כי יקח איש אשה. Avraham & servant Eliezer cut an oath alliance Torah common law legal precedent prototype. The hand-under-thigh Torah language refers to an oath sworn obligation through which the גזירה שוה equally applies to the קידושין oath brit obligation which obligates a Man to give a get to his ex-wife if he divorces her. What does the mitzva of קידושין acquire? The Nefesh O’lam Ha’Ba of the woman’s soul! Specifically learned from the Torah precedent בכל נפשך repeated twice in the opening first two paragraphs of the ק”ש. Bereishit Rabbah learns this critical גזרה שוה, as a critical proto–common law precedent; a foundational legal principles or decisions that define the development of Oral Torah common law as we know it today.

    The רבוי מיעט – The acquired “wife” does not lose her independent da’at. Kiddushin-betrothal does not confer ownership over the woman, her various aspect: such as her body, labor or personhood. She exits marital status through get, not resale. Never does she qualify as ממון: money, valuable possessions, and property. Herein interprets the k’vanna of the language of our Av Mishna, which does not say: האשה נקנית לאיש, but האשה נקנית בשלש דרכים — the mitzva of קידושין separates this woman from all other women. Herein understand how the gospel Av tuma avoda zara touching the vile story of virgin birth follows Greek mythology of Hercules rather than Oral Torah common law.

    The precedent of Avraham and his servant sworn oath, this Torah brit alliance obligates. Hence this Torah precedent critical in understanding the mitzva of קידושין as an oath alliance brit obligation which obligates both Man and Woman equally. קידושין acquires exclusive – מיעט – over the woman’s nefesh-standing vis-à-vis other men. Herein explains why adultery qualifies as a Capital Crime case which only a Sanhedrin court can adjudicate. Hence no Goyim court qualifies as having authority to issue a divorce. This fundamental recognition that only Torah courts shall determine “the Jewish Problem”, as expressed through the post Shoah oath: NEVER AGAIN.

    Oral Torah does not function as a תולדות commentary on the Written Torah —Oral Torah common law derived from precedent תולדות positive and negative Torah commandments. קידושין acquires a brit-level oath obligation as a Av Torah time-oriented commandment. This oath alliance obligation establishes enforceable duties such as כתובה, גט, & fidelity. This mitzva does not treat the acquisition of a wife comparable to how a man acquires ownership of a עבד כנעני; the concept of “soul” understood as title acquired to all future born children fathered consequent to this קידושין. This Torah mitzva serves to amplify the k’vanna of swearing an oath alliance לשמה – the first Sinai commandment; the greatest commandment in the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

    ולרב הונא דאמר חופה קונה מק״ו

    למעוטי מאי

    למעוטי חליפין

    This question cannot be asked within Rabbi Yishmael’s כלל–פרט system alone, because: A pure ק״ו would expand; a pure גזירה שוה from שדה עפרון would import all kinyanim. Hence the danger: ס״ד אמינא:

    הואיל וגמר קיחה קיחה משדה עפרון

    מה שדה מקניא בחליפין

    אף אשה נמי מקניא בחליפין

    This while logically correct under Rabbi Yishmael’s sh’itta. But rabbi Akiva’s קמ״ל = רבוי מיעט, not כלל–פרט. So קמ״ל here teaches the negative boundary of the רבוי, just as it likewise understands the relationship between Shabbat to Chol! A very important precedent since the mitzva of shabbat critically defines: HOLY; just as korbanot dedications define the kingship mitzva of Moshiach. Moshe anointed the House of Aaron to dedicate the nation to pursue righteous judicial justice. The prophet Natan cursed the House of David with eternal Civil War after he failed to rule with justice in the matter of the baal of Bat Sheva. Just as Aaron did not offer up barbeques to Heaven through korbanot, so to the Moshiach does not rule as king if he fails to establish righteous common law Federal Sanhedrin courts!

    Acquisition to the “title” Nefesh O’lam Ha’ba of the woman’s soul does not compare to buying or selling chattel. Reading the Talmud as if it compares to the novel of a Harry Potter NT false messiah – Protocols of the Elders of Zion fraud-literalism, destroys and uproots precedent-based Oral Torah common law/משנה תורה. Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of פרדס inductive logic, ancient Greek syllogism deductive logic simply does not work any more than does the Yad, Tur, or Shulkan Aruch assists students to correctly understand how to study and learn the Talmud. Hence the sages codified in the Talmud referred to as “Oral Torah”, whereas the Rambam Yad in no way, shape, manner, or form qualifies as Oral Torah. The two systems compare to the Planets of Mars and Venus.

    The קמ”ל always signals רבוי–מיעט. In this particular case: it excludes chalipin, despite the valid ק״ו logic. Because the acquired object – a brit obligation over the “nefesh” soul. Which likewise the Oral Torah differs from the Yad, Tur, Shulkan Aruch counterfeits, the acquisition of “nefesh” simply not ממון, but rather the future born children – the definition of the first Torah commandment: be fruitful and multiply. The רבוי מיעט of the קידושין acquisition of “soul”, separates Goyim from the chosen מיעט Cohen people created through the Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandment of קידושין. Which aligns perfectly with Bereishit Rabbah’s oath-alliance precedent.

    The concluding statement of מדרש רבה נט:ח — א”ר יצחק חטיא דקרתך זונין זרע מנהון. Rabbi Yitzhak stated: ‘The wrongdoing of your actions prevents their sustenance from coming;’ restated: “produces continuity only when obligation is preserved.” This closing statement of Midrash Rabbah נט:ח functions as a juridical boundary marker – informing how legal drosh “borders”; the Tosafists reasoning perhaps qualifies it as הלכה למעשה. My sh’itta of inductive reasoning argues the comparison between the case of our Gemara — to the case introduced by Midrash Rabba (the definition of inductive vs deductive reasoning) – do not interpret the קידושין oath brit alliance as the acquisition of an object but rather as the very definition of creating the chosen cohen people through tohor time-oriented commandments.

    Torah common law draws category boundaries, such as Sanhedrin courts only have legal jurisdiction within the borders of Judea. Or prophets serve as the police enforcers of judicial common law legal rulings; if no Sanhedrin courts then likewise no prophets. Despite the koran narishkeit which declares that prophets sent to all peoples across the Planet and the Arabs the last people on Earth to receive their “chosen” prophet; hence their absurd declaration that Muhammad was the last of the prophets!

    חליפין has the legal meaning which presumes חפץ – a thing. ‘Fungible goods items’ qualify as horse-trading, interchangeable goods. Fungibility facilitates easy transactions and exchanges. Representative by contrast refers to something or someone who stands in for or symbolizes someone or something else. Like Representatives voted into the Federal Congress, they serve as proxies for the voting electorate within any given US State. In basic horse-trading, money functions as a representative of legal trade instead of barter. A common custom practiced by Goyim societies: wife swapping.

    Torah law never universalizes categories without jurisdiction. This fundamental מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד middah forever separates Torah common law from Islamic (and Christian) universal-prophetic claims, which erase jurisdictional boundaries entirely.

    Kiddushin cannot tolerate representation … wife swapping. A nefesh cannot be substituted; brit cannot be “grafted” to Goyim who do not and never have accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Fidelity cannot be symbolically reassigned; the Torah oath brit which creates the chosen Cohen people defined to Talmudic established culture and customs, personal, exclusive, & non-fungible. The Torah phrase “והיו לבשר אחד” — not metaphysics — rather anti-fungibility common law. Therefore חליפין utterly treif in the matter of קידושין because it baptizes brit into a substitute theology exchange which replaces the pursuit of justice as faith for belief in some theologically created new God as faith.

    The mitzva of קידושין rejects the Goyim custom which perceives marital bonds as transferable; persons as interchangeable units; relationships as revocable exchanges which defines the legal concept of fungibility in human marital relations. Therefore our Gemara blocks that endpoint at the root by excluding חליפין. Herein our Gemara separate kiddushin from market place logic of acquisition of goods and property.

    Therefore, קמ״ל in Kiddushin functions as a רבוי–מיעט marker: it affirms that Kiddushin functions as a true kinyan, while excluding any kinyan whose logic presumes fungible object-ownership; therefore חליפין – excluded because brit over nefesh cannot be represented, substituted, or exchanged.

    Like

    Reply

        2. Consider myself a Talmudic scholar. My central argument favors inductive reasoning logic taught by rabbis Akiva, Yishmael Yossi HaGalilee and absolutely rejects the deductive reasoning logic as taught by both Plato, Aristotle, the Rambam and virtually the entire (corrupt) rabbinic Orthodox rabbis following the Rambam Civil War. The set of Reshonim scholars whom I most respect Rashi’s common law commentary to the Torah, the grand-children of Rashi and their common law commentary written on the Talmud, the criticisms made by the Baali Maor on the Rif’s common law halachic code. Especially respect the B’HaG and Midrash, Rif, Rosh and Rabbeinu Tam – the leader of the Baali Tosafot French common law school of Talmudic scholarship.

          Like

        10. Liked Van Halen as a student at Texas A&M. But since moving to Israel in 1991, just prior to the Gulf War, have not listened to his music like when I was a student in the early 1980s.

          You have laid down the rules for your blog and I intend to obey those rules.

          Like

        21. My original intent had nothing to do with Van Halen. Post Shoah Israelis like myself view Jewish assimilation as one of the prime causes for the Shoah.

          Like

  5. Good to hear that that Sammy and Co deliver since I just ordered this yesterday…

    I’m stuck on listening to Ufo: Seven Deadly. You know that feeling when an album just hits a spot and u just keep on pushing replay for days on end….What’s your take on the band Ufo? And which albums have made you punch the replay button repeatedly lately.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. UFO are one of those bands like Saxon that everybody likes, but I only have two greatest hits CDs. It seemed like enough for me. I dunno why some things really click and some things do not.

      The replay button: I keep going back to the new Darkness album lately. A couple songs on that one like Hot on Your Tail just keep bringing me back!

      Like

      Reply

        1. Oh yeah there are some pretty funny bits on the album! The new One Way Ticket box set isn’t out in Canada yet, but will be out in 2026 (January I think).

          Like

  7. I saw Sammy Hagar live this past September at the iHeartRadio Music Festival in Las Vegas and he still sounds great! It is sad that he’s getting older and it definitely shows in his voice, but I’m glad he can still perform and do what he loves.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a reply to Holen Cancel reply